Top40-Charts.com
Support our efforts,
sign up for our $5 membership!
(Start for free)
Register or login with just your e-mail address
Metal / Hard Rock 30 December, 2004

Jon Stainbrook's side of the Staind lawsuit

Hot Songs Around The World

Espresso
Sabrina Carpenter
402 entries in 26 charts
Beautiful Things
Benson Boone
628 entries in 27 charts
Million Dollar Baby
Tommy Richman
216 entries in 21 charts
Gata Only
Floyymenor & Cris MJ
258 entries in 15 charts
Houdini
Eminem
207 entries in 24 charts
A Bar Song (Tipsy)
Shaboozey
307 entries in 22 charts
Birds Of A Feather
Billie Eilish
231 entries in 21 charts
Not Like Us
Kendrick Lamar
202 entries in 20 charts
I Like The Way You Kiss Me
Artemas
361 entries in 26 charts
Stumblin' In
Cyril
309 entries in 16 charts
Grustnyi Dens
Artik & Asti
189 entries in 2 charts
I Had Some Help
Post Malone & Morgan Wallen
206 entries in 20 charts
Too Sweet
Hozier
373 entries in 22 charts
Stargazing
Myles Smith
218 entries in 18 charts
NEW YORK (www.cyberlawyer.com/staind.html)

STAIND vs. STAINBROOK
Although STAIND was not successful in their first federal lawsuit in New York against Ohio musician Jon Stainbrook, they have filed yet another lawsuit against him in Ohio. The lawsuit in Ohio is in response to Stainbrook's petition filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requesting cancellation of STAIND's trademarks.
Stainbrook alleges STAIND's trademarks are invalid, because they were obtained by STAIND through fraudulent statements to the USPTO. STAIND has admitted the statements made in their registration of STAIND with the USPTO were not accurate and claims they are 'a harmless typographical or ministerial error' and an 'inadvertent error'.
Another 'inadvertent error' STAIND fails to mention in their lawsuit against Stainbrook is the mistaken registration of a band called Stain from Cincinnati, Ohio instead of their intended registrant, Stainbrook's band, the STAIN, of Toledo, Ohio.
Regardless of their excuses, the USPTO considers it fraud if the applicant knowingly submits false information in the procurement of the mark and the USPTO can cancel the mark on those grounds alone.

If it is decided their trademarks were obtained through fraudulent statements to the USPTO, STAIND could be required by a federal court to change the name of their band and discontinue distribution of all products labeled STAIND. Stainbrook has previously prevailed in two federal lawsuits relating to the STAIN trademark and is confident his winning streak will continue.

For further information, please contact:
Jon Stainbrook, 419-514-1509, [email protected]
Anthony DeGidio, Esq., 419-382-9590, [email protected]

For supporting documents, please see:
https://www.cyberlawyer.com/stain.html






Most read news of the week


© 2001-2024
top40-charts.com (S6)
about | site map
contact | privacy
Page gen. in 0.0058441 secs // 5 () queries in 0.0065841674804688 secs