Top40-Charts.com
Support our efforts,
sign up for our $5 membership!
(Start for free)
Register or login with just your e-mail address
Metal / Hard Rock 30 December, 2004

Jon Stainbrook's side of the Staind lawsuit

Hot Songs Around The World

APT.
Rose & Bruno Mars
569 entries in 29 charts
Not Like Us
Kendrick Lamar
421 entries in 26 charts
Die With A Smile
Lady Gaga & Bruno Mars
795 entries in 30 charts
The Emptiness Machine
Linkin Park
259 entries in 21 charts
That's So True
Gracie Abrams
419 entries in 22 charts
Messy
Lola Young
272 entries in 24 charts
Sailor Song
Gigi Perez
347 entries in 19 charts
Bad Dreams
Teddy Swims
296 entries in 19 charts
Si Antes Te Hubiera Conocido
Karol G
330 entries in 13 charts
Abracadabra
Lady Gaga
142 entries in 26 charts
Birds Of A Feather
Billie Eilish
925 entries in 25 charts
Camino Por La Selva
Luli Pampin
177 entries in 3 charts
A Bar Song (Tipsy)
Shaboozey
829 entries in 22 charts
Stargazing
Myles Smith
479 entries in 20 charts
NEW YORK (www.cyberlawyer.com/staind.html)

STAIND vs. STAINBROOK
Although STAIND was not successful in their first federal lawsuit in New York against Ohio musician Jon Stainbrook, they have filed yet another lawsuit against him in Ohio. The lawsuit in Ohio is in response to Stainbrook's petition filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requesting cancellation of STAIND's trademarks.
Stainbrook alleges STAIND's trademarks are invalid, because they were obtained by STAIND through fraudulent statements to the USPTO. STAIND has admitted the statements made in their registration of STAIND with the USPTO were not accurate and claims they are 'a harmless typographical or ministerial error' and an 'inadvertent error'.
Another 'inadvertent error' STAIND fails to mention in their lawsuit against Stainbrook is the mistaken registration of a band called Stain from Cincinnati, Ohio instead of their intended registrant, Stainbrook's band, the STAIN, of Toledo, Ohio.
Regardless of their excuses, the USPTO considers it fraud if the applicant knowingly submits false information in the procurement of the mark and the USPTO can cancel the mark on those grounds alone.

If it is decided their trademarks were obtained through fraudulent statements to the USPTO, STAIND could be required by a federal court to change the name of their band and discontinue distribution of all products labeled STAIND. Stainbrook has previously prevailed in two federal lawsuits relating to the STAIN trademark and is confident his winning streak will continue.

For further information, please contact:
Jon Stainbrook, 419-514-1509, [email protected]
Anthony DeGidio, Esq., 419-382-9590, [email protected]

For supporting documents, please see:
https://www.cyberlawyer.com/stain.html






Most read news of the week


© 2001-2025
top40-charts.com (S6)
about | site map
contact | privacy
Page gen. in 0.0073769 secs // 5 () queries in 0.0065314769744873 secs