Top40-Charts.com
Support our efforts,
sign up for our $5 membership!
(Start for free)
Register or login with just your e-mail address
Metal / Hard Rock 30 December, 2004

Jon Stainbrook's side of the Staind lawsuit

Hot Songs Around The World

Ordinary
Alex Warren
252 entries in 25 charts
APT.
Rose & Bruno Mars
767 entries in 29 charts
Die With A Smile
Lady Gaga & Bruno Mars
990 entries in 30 charts
Luther
Kendrick Lamar & SZA
190 entries in 14 charts
Abracadabra
Lady Gaga
286 entries in 28 charts
Azizam
Ed Sheeran
120 entries in 23 charts
Pink Pony Club
Chappell Roan
212 entries in 11 charts
Messy
Lola Young
445 entries in 25 charts
Camino Por La Selva
Luli Pampin
190 entries in 3 charts
A Bar Song (Tipsy)
Shaboozey
897 entries in 22 charts
Si Antes Te Hubiera Conocido
Karol G
364 entries in 13 charts
Anxiety
Sleepy Hallow & Doechii
198 entries in 25 charts
Beautiful Things
Benson Boone
1239 entries in 27 charts
Birds Of A Feather
Billie Eilish
1047 entries in 25 charts
NEW YORK (www.cyberlawyer.com/staind.html)

STAIND vs. STAINBROOK
Although STAIND was not successful in their first federal lawsuit in New York against Ohio musician Jon Stainbrook, they have filed yet another lawsuit against him in Ohio. The lawsuit in Ohio is in response to Stainbrook's petition filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requesting cancellation of STAIND's trademarks.
Stainbrook alleges STAIND's trademarks are invalid, because they were obtained by STAIND through fraudulent statements to the USPTO. STAIND has admitted the statements made in their registration of STAIND with the USPTO were not accurate and claims they are 'a harmless typographical or ministerial error' and an 'inadvertent error'.
Another 'inadvertent error' STAIND fails to mention in their lawsuit against Stainbrook is the mistaken registration of a band called Stain from Cincinnati, Ohio instead of their intended registrant, Stainbrook's band, the STAIN, of Toledo, Ohio.
Regardless of their excuses, the USPTO considers it fraud if the applicant knowingly submits false information in the procurement of the mark and the USPTO can cancel the mark on those grounds alone.

If it is decided their trademarks were obtained through fraudulent statements to the USPTO, STAIND could be required by a federal court to change the name of their band and discontinue distribution of all products labeled STAIND. Stainbrook has previously prevailed in two federal lawsuits relating to the STAIN trademark and is confident his winning streak will continue.

For further information, please contact:
Jon Stainbrook, 419-514-1509, jcstain@aol.com
Anthony DeGidio, Esq., 419-382-9590, tony@cyberlawyer.com

For supporting documents, please see:
https://www.cyberlawyer.com/stain.html






Most read news of the week


© 2001-2025
top40-charts.com (S6)
about | site map
contact | privacy
Page gen. in 1.6283331 secs // 4 () queries in 0.4272632598877 secs